ESP8266 - Operating voltage range and sleep current


(Eyal Lebedinsky) #27

Very good. I want to see the full graph during a run. Can you bring in the scope? This should be both educational and fun!


(Derryn Harvie) #28

I’ll try. I’m not going to be able to hang around for long tonight.


(Eyal Lebedinsky) #29

I am now doing some long tests where I isolate the steps.

All do a dsleep(3*1000000) between runs.

  1. An empty loop (just the dsleep). Stopped after about 11,000 runs (10 hours overnight). So I call this stable.

  2. Only read the ds18b20 (no WiFi at all). Stopped after 3,800 runs (3h38m). Looks stable too.

  3. A full run (read & publish) but without WiFi setup, doing only wifi.sta.connect(), which also saves 1.5s. I suspect that the setup writes to flash, hence this test. Running… Stopped after 3,000 runs. Looks stable again.

This version now uploaded to ESP8266Lib as examples/eyal/ds18b20, but I continue the tests.

  1. Following on the suspicion in [3], now do a simple run that only makes a WiFi connection but no reading and no communication. First did a full blank+flash+upload+compile. Running… died in 3 minutes. Case closed?

  2. A full run as [3] again, to confirm that it can run for a full day. Running since 18:24… died after 9,421 runs (12h). Good but not perfect.

  • This failure is different, the fw and fs were intact, but the WiFi setup was lost (so IP was never acquired). Restarting with use_old_WiFi_setup = false; dofile ("init.lua") continued the run. Running… failed after another 7,659 runs (9h30). This time it needed a fw flash.
  1. Time to run reBoot.lua [as (1) above] for a longer time. Running… over 25,000 (more than one day). Stopped

  2. Move to running the exact same test but with WiFi set up (so it will be automatically established). Running… over 25,000 runs (more than one day), stopped.

  3. Now running reWiFi.lua (with use_old_WiFi_setup = true) which just waits for an IP. Running… 26,000 runs (more than one day). Stopped.

  4. Now running reWiFi.lua (with use_old_WiFi_setup = false). Expecting an early failure. Running… died in minutes.
    Tried again… failed soon.


(Eyal Lebedinsky) #30

Following up on my experiments so far.

After adding a large cap (470uf) across the power lines, adding pull up/downs wherever it is recommended and using a capable DC-DC off a USB wall charger, I now have it running in the bedroom since 2015/02/25-09:30:02 (yes, I have the log). I did get a few issues along the way but since 2015/02/27-21:14:25 (so about for days now) it is going uninterrupted.

Interestingly, a few times the tmr.now() function returned Infinity, even for the call that is the first line in init.lua.

The following log columns are: time , run count, times, VDD, temp.
The times are : init start, time to read the ds18b20, time as dsleep(60) is issued (so the full run time).

20150303092547 8171 times=0.287835,0.035485,1.2434 vdd=3.38  21.1875
20150303092647 8172 times=Infinity,0.035489,1.24346 vdd=3.38  21.25
20150303092747 8173 times=0.292882,0.03549,1.26849 vdd=3.38  21.25

One small change in the program [in response to test (5) above which I encountered again] is that if the WiFi connect is not completed in 15 seconds (it usually takes a fraction of a second) the program issues the full WiFi setmode/config/connect (but only once). Normally it skips this and just waits for an IP.

An example of a case where (I assume) this was triggered:

20150303081153 8097 times=0.291779,0.035497,1.24335 vdd=3.38  20.375
20150303081256 8098 times=0.285323,0.03549,4.268 vdd=3.38  20.375
20150303081413 8099 times=0.290115,0.03549,19.4173 vdd=3.38  20.375
20150303081511 8100 times=0.286637,0.03549,1.26844 vdd=3.38  20.375

The 8098 line shows a slow cycle (happened a few times) and the following one is probably a failure followed by a reset.

[much later] The setup has now run for over two weeks, more that 25,000 cycles (60s each). It feels so wrong but I plan to experiment further by reducing the supply voltage (it is using an adjustable DC-DC from a wall USB charger) to see how it affects the operation. Now it reports about 3.39v when active, and I expect that it goes up to at least 3.5v when sleeping.

[way later] After running for over a month I did turn it off and tried a few things. It never worked for more that a few hours at a time since :-(


#31

Thanks very much for the experimental testing of this issue. Time for 1S battery + USB charged 150g robots. If I can solve the delay issues with the control interface I have setup.

Steve


(Derryn Harvie) #32

So Eyal,

I take it we still don’t know for sure what’s making them unreliable?


(Eyal Lebedinsky) #33

@Harvs

No, we know quiet a bit. The discussion moved to the esp8266 forum
http://www.esp8266.com/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=1418
and apart from agreeing that we do not know the exact reason for the crash, we suspect a timing issue and a solution (a hack) from Cal that makes it stable is available on page 11
http://www.esp8266.com/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=1418&start=100

You do need to build the fw with this small change though. Or I can upload a binary if you want.

Also, the SDK 1.0 based build that is available here


is said to not crash. Naturally this SDK has many other bug fixes. It uses more memory so I found my project does not completely fit. But I need to spend some time trimming it…

Give these a try.

[later] I should add that as we speak I have six modules (all different forms) scattered around the house reading temperature and reporting to my server, which then plots the temp and vdd of all.

This one (a nodemcu board) is hanging 75cm below the ceiling of the bedroom and runs off a 18650. You can see the battery draining then replaced with a larger one. You can see the heater kicking in at night and then cycling until morning.
One may be able to notice that I replaced the heater 10 days ago. The current one has a larger hysteresis than the old one (the first three days) and then for three nights I had one that had wide (7 dC) slow cycles that was returned. I am still tuning the new setup.

Of the six modules one is running off a wall wart (set to 3V), one off a 18650 and the rest off 3xAA (one has a 7333 LDO but the rest have no power conditioning). They are all stable now (for a couple of weeks at least).

cheers


(Eyal Lebedinsky) #34

Moving on, I want to construct a suitable power source. It seems that 3xAA will deliver over 4V initially, as will a fully charged 18650. a 3.3v regulator should be a good thing. I need an LDO with high enough driving current and low power wastage. Looking on element14 I see this as a possibility:
http://au.element14.com/texas-instruments/tps73733dcq/ic-voltage-regulator/dp/1703384
It requires little extra (one cap, and an optional second). However, as an SMD it needs a nice little board to mount it on. Something similar to this ASM7111-3.3 module:
http://www.aliexpress.com/item/-/1804418949.html
but with less components so probably smaller.

Does anyone have experience with constructing such boards?
Is this LDO a suitable one?


(Derryn Harvie) #35

Yes… To start with we can just knock up an etched board.

I wouldn’t think so. It does not state what it’s quiescent current is when operating (which will be the whole time if we’re using the ESP to do timing.) The fact it’s not spec’d in the datasheet tells me it’s not going to be good.

I got 10 of these on my last element14 order:
http://au.element14.com/microchip/mcp1825s-3302e-db/ic-ldo-3-3v-500ma-sot-223-3/dp/1578404?ost=MICROCHIP++MCP1825S-3302E%2FDB

They have a typical quiescent current of 120uA, which still isn’t where I’d like it to be, but it’s not too bad. This is typically very temp dependent.


(Eyal Lebedinsky) #36

OK, looks like a good place to start. I am ready to try and put a board together (always happy to experiment on other people’s stuff). I need to learn to do this, but will later prefer to order boards instead. I hope the soldering will not be an issue, not having worked with SMD before.

My observation is that a properly working node consumes 100mAsec in 1.5 seconds of activity then sleeps (I assume 80uA) for the rest of the minute (I plan for 1m reporting but could easily accept 5m if needed). The LDO will use 120uA all the time (or only when idle? How do I interpret the Iq).

So all up per minute: 100 + (60-1.5)0.08 + 600.120 = 100 + 4.68 + 7.2 = 111.88mAsec per min = 1.86mAmin
Let’s call it 2mAh all up.

This translates to 500 hours (21 days) from a 1Ah battery. But the battery delivers 4.1-2.6V (Li-Ion) or 4.0-3.0V (3xAA). I should really work in Wh units though.
And the LDO is probably not 100% efficient - is it specified? I need to learn to read those datasheets.


(Derryn Harvie) #37

All the time that it’s active. Unless we power down the ESP rail and have some other time keeping device (my idea was to use an MSP430), then we have to keep it active all the time to power the ESP.

The way linear regs work is you’re input current is approx equal to the output current + quiescent current. So efficiency isn’t really the right way of looking at it, there’s no voltage translation like there is with a switching regulator. Once you get below the target voltage + drop out voltage, then the output voltage will usually fall equal to the input voltage - dropout voltage (in this case typ. 210mV.) So you have to take this voltage drop into account when considering lowest usable battery voltage.


(Eyal Lebedinsky) #38

Powering down the whole shebang means all devices will do a cold restart. For the esp it does not matter to me (though it does have one timer that keeps running and is available across a deep sleep). The thermometer will probably take a long time to read (speced to need 750ms when otherwise I have the latest reading in 60ms). How much power does the msp430 use (I see it can go below 1uA in ultra-low-power)? And it takes this to a higher price bracket too.

I am sure TI has an msp430 base item that includes WiFi and can run the whole project (instead of the esp), right?


(Derryn Harvie) #39

I don’t believe there is an MSP430 with WIFI, the msp430 is a small low power micro that wouldn’t be able to implement a full TCP/IP stack. TI have separate modules, but the price is in the order of 10x a ESP.

An MSP430 with xtal for the internal RTC will still be <$1. So personally I wouldn’t be too worried about the cost of it. It does complicate the whole thing though.

Are you using the DS18b20 sensors? There voltage range is quite a lot wider, and they have a very low standby current at <1uA.

I too would prefer to not use a second micro as well. Two sets of code makes life a lot more painful.


(Eyal Lebedinsky) #40

OK then. How about having the MSP be the orchestrator of a project, keeping time and turning things on/off. It can then be used in any project where the “slave” devices do the actual work, and they can be as complex at the task required.

The “MSP430 with xtal” still needs to be set on a board with output power rails (for the slaves), maybe logic to manage a battery (charge it too?)… looks simple but rather a big step for me (with no experience here). I wonder if people are interested in making such a thing for use in their projects (I am).

And yes, I do use the ds18b20 which needs at least 3.0v and runs on 1mA so is not too bad as long as it can be put to sleep (I currently do not actively do this but I hope it goes into standby [at 3uA] by itself when idle).

@Harvs I heard you mention the MSP430 before - how are you using it?


(Eyal Lebedinsky) #41

For the record: I measured the current used when in deep sleep at different supply voltage.
This is an esp-07, which still has the power LED.

I should mention that I found the esp goes mad when the supply voltage goes low (as in 3.1v) and needs a good spark (3.4V or even above) to come back to life. This is when it is active, not in deep sleep.

Volt esp-07  esp-12
4.1     810     680uA
4.0     625     530
3.9     500     370
3.8     400     250
3.7     330     170
3.6     280     106
3.5     242      68
3.4     221      40
3.3     202      27
3.2     182      23
3.1     161      22
3.0     142      21.5
2.9     122      21
2.8     102      20.5uA
2.7      82
2.6      66
2.5      51
2.4      37
2.3      30
2.2      28
2.1      26
2.0      24uA

[later] @Harvs As said at the top, the esp-07 has an active LED. I now added the esp-12 which does not have a LED.
The ds18b20 does not make a significant difference.


(Derryn Harvie) #42

Your results at 3.3V are about an order of magnitude greater than I measured (post one of this thread.)

Do you have any LEDs on that board that are on? I removed all the LEDs.


(Eyal Lebedinsky) #43

I added better readings above.

I am now trying to use 4xAA (at about 5.4V initially) through an AMS1117 on the esp-12. I measured almost 3mA from the battery to the 1117 when there was no load (the LED was removed from the 1117 board, it was more like 7mA with it through a 1K resistor).

If this is a reflection of what one can expect from using a regulator then it is not promising, I hope a proper LDO does a significantly better job to make it an overall win.

Here is an example of a run with 3xAA (2300mAh NiMH) batteries without any regulation:

The voltage started at about 4.1V* and dropped below 4v after two days. After it hit 3.7v it started a nosedive and would have been depleted in less than a day.

If we supply regulated 3.3v then on the esp we save between 650uA and 80uA. How much will the LDO dissipate? How will this change if we use 4xAA(5.4-4.8v) rather than 3xAA(4.1-3.6v)?

I am ready to test this.

(*) Vdd is measured with a 12 bit ADC so the often max 4.094v read is an indication of an overflow. But I do not expect it gets much higher - I see just under 4.3v from 3xAA fresh out the charger with no load.


(Derryn Harvie) #44

The 1117 is an old regulator, originally designed by National Semiconductor if I’m not mistaken, long before they were bought out by TI. Why they are popular, is because of their age they’re now a jelly bean part made by many manufacturers and are hence cheap and readily available.

Having said that, an 8051 is cheap and readily available yet we don’t bother using them anymore.

Have a look at the datasheet for the AMS1117.
http://www.advanced-monolithic.com/pdf/ds1117.pdf
page 3
Quiescent current is spec’ed as typ. 5mA @ 25 degrees, up to max 10mA @ 125C

You’ve just got the wrong part for the job.


(Eyal Lebedinsky) #45

Interestingly, I was just now looking at some data sheets…

The 1117 is really bad, true.
The LM2936 seems to require higher input voltage and Iq is specified for input over 8V.
The TLV733 looks OK, with the output current on the low side but may be able to handle the short spikes of double that.
The 1825 is OK but with a higher Iq.

                        AMS1117         TI-TLV73333     TI-LM2936       MCP1825S
Input Voltage min (V)   4.8             1.4             5.5             2.1
Dropout Voltage (mV)    1100    1300    125     220     120     250     210     350
Quiescent Current (uA)  5000    11000   34              15      20      120     220
Output Current (mA)     1000            300             250             500

(Derryn Harvie) #46

I did some testing of the MCP1825S, on the assumption that 3.0V is the min required for the ESP.

Quiescent Current ~120uA